Goodhart’s Law

Updated on April 4, 2024
Article byKumar Rahul
Edited byKumar Rahul
Reviewed byDheeraj Vaidya, CFA, FRM

What Is Goodhart’s Law?

Goodhart’s Law, in a financial context, refers to the phenomenon which states that when a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a reliable indicator. It highlights the potential pitfalls of relying too heavily on a single financial metric or hand as a performance measure.

Goodhart's Law

You are free to use this image on your website, templates, etc, Please provide us with an attribution linkHow to Provide Attribution?Article Link to be Hyperlinked
For eg:
Source: Goodhart’s Law (

It suggests that when used as the primary targets for policy-making or investment decisions, metrics like GDP growth, inflation rates, or stock prices may lose effectiveness over time as people and markets adapt to meet those targets. It emphasizes the importance of considering multiple indicators and being mindful of unintended consequences when relying on any single metric for decision-making.

Key Takeaways

  • Goodhart’s Law highlights the potential for unintended consequences when using metrics as targets. These consequences can include distorted behavior, ethical concerns, compromised performance measurement, and a narrow focus on meeting targets rather than addressing the underlying reality.
  • It emphasizes the need for a systems-thinking approach. Understanding the broader system and the interdependencies between metrics, indicators, and actors can help identify potential distortions and mitigate the adverse effects.
  • It raises ethical concerns, particularly when targets or metrics get priority over broader ethical principles. It is essential to foster a culture of transparency, ethical behavior, and responsible decision-making when using metrics in organizational or societal contexts.

Goodhart’s Law Explained

Goodhart’s Law states that once a metric is used as a basis for decision-making or control, it loses its reliability as an accurate measure. In other words, when a financial indicator becomes a target, it no longer reflects the underlying economic reality.

The law is named after Charles Goodhart, a British economist who first articulated this concept in the context of monetary policy. Goodhart was a London School of Economics professor and an advisor to the Bank of England. In 1975, he published a paper titled “Problems of Monetary Management: The U.K. Experience,” outlining this idea.

Goodhart originally intended to highlight central banks‘ challenges using specific indicators, such as the money supply, as the sole basis for formulating monetary policy. He observed that once the central bank focused on controlling the money supply, it ceased to be a reliable indicator of inflation and economic activity. Individuals and financial institutions would adjust their behavior in response to the central bank’s actions, making the relationship between the money supply and broader economic variables less predictable.

Over time, Goodhart’s Law has been recognized beyond monetary policy and has found relevance in various domains, including finance, economics, and even management theory. It serves as a cautionary principle, reminding us that when we rely heavily on a single metric to guide decisions or as a performance target, unintended consequences can arise as people adapt their behavior to meet those targets, undermining the original use of the metric.

Financial Modeling & Valuation Courses Bundle (25+ Hours Video Series)

–>> If you want to learn Financial Modeling & Valuation professionally , then do check this ​Financial Modeling & Valuation Course Bundle​ (25+ hours of video tutorials with step by step McDonald’s Financial Model). Unlock the art of financial modeling and valuation with a comprehensive course covering McDonald’s forecast methodologies, advanced valuation techniques, and financial statements.


Goodhart’s Law can manifest itself in various forms across different domains. Here are a few common conditions of Goodhart’s Law:

  1. Financial Metrics: When an economic metric is used as a performance target, people or organizations may find ways to manipulate it to achieve the desired outcome, even if it doesn’t align with the underlying economic reality. For example, suppose a company uses earnings per share (EPS) as a key performance indicator. In that case, executives may use short-term financial engineering techniques, such as share buybacks or accounting adjustments, to artificially boost EPS without necessarily improving the company’s long-term prospects.
  2. Economic Indicators: Governments and policymakers often rely on economic indicators like GDP growth, unemployment, or inflation rates to formulate policies and make decisions. However, once these indicators become explicit targets, individuals and institutions may adjust their response behavior, distorting their accuracy. For instance, governments may implement short-term stimulus measures to artificially boost GDP growth numbers without addressing the underlying structural issues in the economy.
  3. Education and Testing: Standardized tests are often used to assess student knowledge and performance. However, when test scores become the primary focus, teachers and schools may narrow their curriculum and teach to the test, neglecting other important aspects of education. This can lead to students being well-prepared for the specific test but needing a broader and deeper understanding of the subject matter.
  4. Compliance and Regulations: When specific metrics or targets are used to evaluate compliance in regulatory contexts, individuals or organizations may divert their efforts toward meeting those targets rather than genuinely improving the desired outcomes. This can result in compliance measures that meet the letter of the law but fail to achieve the intended goals.


Let us understand it better with the help of examples:

Example #1

Let’s say a government aims to reduce unemployment rates as a key policy objective. They set a target of bringing the national unemployment rate down to 4% within a year. In response to this target, companies have started implementing short-term measures, such as hiring workers on temporary contracts or reducing work hours, to manipulate the unemployment rate and meet the target. While the official unemployment rate might decrease on paper, the underlying economic reality remains the same, as many workers still need employment or to find stable and secure employment.

Example #2

A news article published in live mint discussed the relationship between metrics and the quality of fiscal deficits. It highlights the potential distortion when policymakers prioritize specific metrics, as per Goodhart’s Law.

It explores the phenomenon known as the “Hanoi Rats” and its implications for fiscal deficit evaluation. Allegedly, policymakers in Hanoi, Vietnam, resorted to unconventional methods to meet fiscal deficit targets. This may have compromised the accuracy and reliability of reported deficits.

Policymakers risk neglecting other vital factors like structural reforms and addressing income inequalities by fixating on specific metrics like debt-to-GDP ratios and fiscal deficit targets. It emphasizes that a narrow focus on metrics can distort the actual effectiveness and quality of fiscal deficits.

It calls for a comprehensive approach to fiscal policy evaluation. Policymakers should consider a broader range of economic realities beyond metrics alone. This ensures the accuracy and effectiveness of budgetary deficit assessments, thereby avoiding the potential pitfalls of Goodhart’s Law.


Goodhart’s Law holds significant importance in various fields for several reasons:

  1. Decision-making: Goodhart’s Law cautions against over-reliance on a single metric or indicator. Recognizing this helps decision-makers consider a broader range of indicators and factors, leading to more informed and comprehensive decision-making.
  2. Avoiding unintended consequences: By understanding Goodhart’s Law, policymakers, managers, and individuals can anticipate and mitigate potential consequences. This awareness encourages a more holistic and nuanced approach to goal-setting, ensuring that actions to meet targets do not undermine the original purpose or create adverse side effects.
  3. Systemic analysis: Goodhart’s Law prompts individuals to think beyond simplistic cause-and-effect relationships. It encourages a deeper examination of a system’s complex interactions and dynamics. Decision-makers can adopt a more systems-thinking approach, considering multiple factors and interdependencies.
  4. Improved performance measurement: Goodhart’s Law highlights the limitations of using a single metric to measure performance. It encourages the development of more comprehensive performance measurement frameworks that consider multiple indicators and qualitative aspects. By using a broader set of measures, decision-makers can gain a more accurate and holistic understanding of performance and progress.
  5. Ethical considerations: Goodhart’s Law raises ethical concerns by highlighting potential manipulations or distortions when a metric becomes a target. It encourages organizations and individuals to consider the ethical implications of their actions in pursuit of targets. This ensures that the chosen metrics align with ethical principles and long-term sustainability.

How To Avoid?

Avoiding the potential pitfalls of Goodhart’s Law requires a thoughtful and nuanced approach. Here are some strategies to mitigate its impact:

  1. Diversify metrics: Instead of relying on a single metric as the sole measure of performance or target, use a set of complementary metrics that provide a more comprehensive view. Consider quantitative and qualitative indicators to capture a broader range of factors relevant to the desired outcome.
  2. Monitor unintended consequences: Continuously evaluate the potential consequences of using specific metrics as targets. Look for any distortions or manipulations that may arise, and adjust your approach accordingly. Actively seek stakeholder feedback and insights to understand the broader impacts of your decisions and targets.
  3. Emphasize context and judgment: Acknowledge the context-specific nature of metrics and targets. Understand that their meaning and relevance may vary across different situations and timeframes. Use professional judgment and expertise to interpret metrics within the larger context. Also, consider additional qualitative information that may provide a more nuanced understanding.
  4. Regularly review and update metrics: Periodically reassess the metrics used and their alignment with the desired outcomes. As circumstances change, update the metrics to remain relevant and meaningful.
  5. Foster a transparency and ethical behavior culture: Promote an environment where open dialogue and ethical considerations are critical. Encourage individuals and organizations to prioritize their actions’ integrity and ethical implications over meeting specific targets.

Goodhart’s Law vs Campbell’s Law

Here’s a comparison between Goodhart’s Law and Campbell’s Law:

BasisGoodhart’s LawCampbell’s Law
DefinitionWhen a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a reliable indicator.The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor.
FocusIt was named after economist Charles Goodhart, who first articulated the concept in the context of monetary policy.Primarily applicable to the social sciences, particularly in evaluating social programs, policies, and educational assessments.
Primary ConcernThe impact of using a metric as a target on the reliability and usefulness of that metric.The corrupting influence and unintended consequences of using quantitative indicators for social decision-making.
OriginIt was named after sociologist Donald T. Campbell, who developed the idea in social research and evaluation.This relates to the potential pitfalls of relying on a single metric or indicator.
ApplicationRelevant in various fields, including finance, economics, management, and policy-making.The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes intended to monitor.
Key MessageCaution against over-reliance on a single metric as it may lead to distorted behavior and undermine the original purpose of the metric.Warns about the potential corruption and distortion of quantitative social indicators, urging a critical examination of their use in decision-making.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. How does Goodhart’s Law relate to incentive systems?

Goodhart’s Law has implications for incentive systems in organizations. When a metric or indicator is the basis for rewarding or penalizing individuals, they focus solely on achieving the target. This potentially leads to consequences or manipulations.

2. Is Goodhart’s Law applicable only to large-scale systems or organizations?

Goodhart’s Law can apply to systems and organizations of various sizes. While it is common in large-scale systems, such as monetary or government policies, the underlying principle remains relevant in smaller-scale contexts. This includes individual decision-making or organizational performance management.

3. How does Goodhart’s Law relate to data-driven decision-making?

Goodhart’s Law raises essential considerations for data-driven decision-making. It highlights the risks of over-reliance on a single metric or indicator and emphasizes the need for a broader understanding of the underlying reality.

This article has been a guide to what is Goodhart’s Law. Here, we explain the topic in detail with its examples, how to avoid it, forms, and implications. You may also find some helpful articles here –

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *