Quick Ratio Definition
Quick ratio, also known as the acid test ratio measure the ability of the company to repay the short term debts with the help of the most liquid assets and it is calculated by adding total cash and equivalents, accounts receivable and the marketable investments of the company and then dividing it by its total current liabilities.
Due to the prohibition of inventory from the formula, this ratio is a better sign than the current ratio of the ability of a company to pay its instant obligations. It is also known as the Acid test ratio or liquid ratio.
Quick ratio Formula = Quick assets / Quick Liabilities. = (Cash and Cash Equivalents + Accounts receivables) / (Current liabilities – Bank overdraft)
A ratio of 1: 1 indicates a highly solvent position. This ratio serves as a supplement to the current ratio in analyzing liquidity.
P&G’s current ratio is healthy at 1.098x in 2016, however, its quick ratio is 0.576x. This implies that a significant amount of P&G current asset is stuck in lesser liquid assets like Inventory or prepaid expenses.
The Importance of Quick ratio
This ratio is one of the major tools for decision-making. It previews the ability of the company to make settlement its quick liabilities in a very short notice period.
- This ratio eliminates the closing stock from the calculation, which may not be necessary be always be taken as a liquid, thereby giving a more suitable profile of the liquidity position of the company.
- Since closing stock is separated from current assets and bank overdraft and cash credit are eliminated from current liabilities as they are usually secured by closing stock thereby preparing the ratio more worthy in ensuring the liquidity position of the company.
- Evaluation of closing stock can be sensitive and it may not always be at saleable value. Therefore, the quick ratio is not impaired, as there is no requirement for the valuation of the closing stock.
- Closing stock can be very seasonal and over a yearly period, it may vary in quantities. I contemplate, it may collapse or escalate liquidity status. By ignoring closing stock from the calculation, the ratio does away with this issue.
- In a sinking industry, which is generally may have a very high level of closing stock; this ratio will help in providing more authentic repayment ability of the company against the current ratio including closing stock.
- Because of the major inventory base, the short-term financial strength of a company may be overstated if the current ratio is utilized. By using this ratio this situation can be tackled and will limit companies getting an additional loan; the servicing of which may not be as simple as reflected by the current ratio.
Interpretation Quick Ratio
- It is a sign of solvency of an organization and should be analyzed over a time period and also in the circumstances of the industry the company controls in.
- Basically, companies should focus to continue to keep this ratio that maintains adequate leverage against liquidity risk given the variables in a particular sector of business among other considerations.
- More uncertain the business environment, the more it is likely that companies would keep higher quick ratios. Reversely, where cash flows are constant and foreseeable, companies would entreat to maintain the quick ratio at relatively lower levels. In any case, companies must attain the correct balance between liquidity risk caused due to a low ratio and the risk of loss caused due to a high ratio.
- An acid ratio that is higher than the average of the industry may be advised that the company is investing too many resources in the working capital of the business which may more profitably be used elsewhere.
- If a company has extra supplementary cash, it may consider investing the excess funds in new ventures and in case the company is out of investment choices it may be advisable to return the surplus funds to shareholders in the form of hiked dividend payments.
- Acid Test Ratio which is lower than the industry average may suggest that the company is taking a high amount of risk by not maintaining a proper shield of liquid resources. Otherwise, a company may have a lower ratio due to better credit terms with suppliers than its competitors.
- When interpreting and analyzing the acid ratio over various periods, it is necessary to take into account seasonal changes in some industries which may produce the ratio to be traditionally higher or lower at certain times of the year as seasonal businesses experience illegitimate effusion of activities leading to changing levels current assets and liabilities over the time.
Analysis of Quick Ratio
The following are the illustration through which calculation and interpretation of the quick ratio provided.
Example 1
The following are the information extracted from audited records at a large size industrial company. (Amount in $)
| Particulars | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 |
| Current assets | 1,10,000 | 90,000 | 80,000 | 75,000 | 65,000 |
| Inventory | 8,000 | 12,000 | 8,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 |
| Current Liabilities | 66,000 | 70,000 | 82,000 | 1,00,000 | 1,00,000 |
| Bank overdraft | 6,000 | 5,000 | 2,000 | 0 | 0 |
Assume that Current Assets = Cash and Cash Equivalents + Accounts Receivables + Inventory. There are no other items included in Current Assets.
You are required to calculate the quick ratio and analyze the trend of the ratio for judging the short term liquidity and solvency of the company.
Answer to Example 1.
Calculation of the quick ratio of the company for the following years.
(Amount in $)
| Particulars | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 |
| Current assets ( A ) | 1,10,000 | 90,000 | 80,000 | 75,000 | 65,000 |
| Less: Inventory (B) | 8,000 | 12,000 | 8,000 | 5,000 | 5,000 |
| Quick Assets (C) = (A – B ) | 1,02,000 | 78,000 | 72,000 | 70,000 | 60,000 |
| Current Liabilities ( D ) | 66,000 | 70,000 | 82,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 |
| Less: Bank overdraft ( E ) | 6,000 | 5,000 | 2,000 | 0 | 0 |
| Quick Liabilities (F) = (D – E) | 60,000 | 65,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 | 80,000 |
| Quick Ratio = ( C ) / ( F ) | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.875 | 0.75 |
From the above-calculated data, we analyzed that the quick ratio has been fallen down from 1.7 in 2011 to 0.6 in 2015. This must mean that most of the current assets are locked up in stocks over a period of time. The ideal standard quick ratio is 1: 1. It means that the company is not in a position to meet its immediate current liabilities; it may lead to technical solvency. Hence, steps should be taken to reduce the investment in the inventory and see that the ratio is above level 1: 1.
The ideal standard ratio is 1: 1. It means that the company is not in a position to meet its immediate current liabilities; it may lead to technical solvency. Hence, steps should be taken to reduce the investment in the inventory and see that the ratio is above level 1: 1.
Example 2
XYZ Limited provides you the following information for the year ending 31st March 2015.
- Working Capital = $45,000
- Current ratio = 2.5 Inventory = $40,000
You are required to calculate and interpret quick ratio.
Answer to Example 2
Given working capital is $ 45,000
Current ratio = 2.5
= Current assets / Current liabilities = 2.5 = Current assets = 2.5 * Current Liabilities
So, working capital = Current Assets – Current Liabilities
= 45,000 = 2.5 Current Liabilities – current liabilities
= 1.5 * current liabilities = 45,000
= current liabilities = 45,000 / 1.5 = 30,000
Therefore, current assets = 2.5 * current liabilities = 2.5 * 30,000 = 75,000
So, current assets and current liabilities are $ 75,000 and $ 30,000 respectively.
- Calculation of acid test ratio
Given Inventory = $40,000
Current assets = $75,000
So, the Quick assets = Current assets – Inventory = $ 75,000 – $ 40,000 = $ 35,000
As there is no bank overdraft available Current liabilities will be consider as Quick liabilities.
So, the Quick liabilities = $ 30,000
Therefore,
Ratio = Quick assets / Quick liabilities
= 35,000 / 30,000
= 1.167
As the calculated acid test ratio is 1.167 which is more than the ideal ratio 1, it reflects that the company is better able to meet its obligation through quick assets.
Colgate Example
Let us now look at the calculations in Colgate.
Ratio of Colgate is relatively healthy (between 0.56x – 0.73x). This acid test shows us the company’s ability to pay off short term liabilities using Receivables and Cash & Cash Equivalents.
Below is a quick comparison of Ratio of Colgate’s vs P&G vs Unilever
As compared to its Peers, Colgate has a very healthy ratio.
While Unilever’s Quick Ratio has been declining for the past 5-6 years, we also note that the P&G ratio is much lower than that of Colgate.
Microsoft Example
As noted from the below graph, the Cash Ratio of Microsoft is a low 0.110x, however, its quick ratio is a massive 2.216x.
source: ycharts
Microsoft Quick Ratio is pretty high primarily due to short term investments of around $106.73 billion! This puts Microsoft in a very comfortable position from the point of view of liquidity / Solvency.
source: Microsoft SEC Filings
Quick Ratio Video
Conclusion
As we note here that current assets may contain large amounts of inventory and prepaid expenses may not be liquid. Therefore, including inventory, such items will skew the current ratio from an immediate liquidity point of view. Quick Ratio solves this problem by not taking inventory into account. It only considers the most liquid assets including cash and cash equivalents and receivables. A ratio that is higher than the industry average may imply that the company is investing too much of its resources in the working capital of the business which may be more profitable elsewhere. However, if the quick ratio is lower than the industry average, it suggests that the company is taking a high amount of risk and not maintaining adequate liquidity.
